Variability within and between situational contexts in four functional areas - Longitudinal predictors and correlates in old age

At a glance

Project duration
04/2025  – 03/2027
DFG classification of subject areas

Developmental and Educational Psychology

Funded by

DFG Individual Research Grant DFG Individual Research GrantDFG Individual Research GrantDFG Individual Research GrantDFG Individual Research GrantDFG Individual Research Grant

Project description

This project aims for a combination of ambulatory and laboratory-based assessments of old and very old participants to examine short-term intraindividual variability in four key domains of functioning: Emotion, interpersonal skills, daily activities, and cognition. Basically, we distinguish potentially adaptive from potentially maladaptive forms of intraindividual variability: Whereas variability within the same or similar situational contexts is primarily a sign of functional instability (within-context instability), variability across different situational contexts may be primarily a sign of functional flexibility (across-context flexibility). Following this basic distinction, the project addresses two overarching objectives: (1) To provide a comprehensive quantification and examination of within-context and across-context variability in each of the four domains of functioning, as well as their association between these domains. (2) An examination of long-term antecedent predictors of within-context instability and across-context flexibility in the four domains – focusing in particular on long-term changes in key resources (e.g., physical health, cognitive abilities, etc.) as risk factors for high instability and/or low flexibility. We follow-up old and very old participants from two ongoing longitudinal studies – i.e., the Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study of Adult Development (ILSE) and satellite project EMIL, as well as the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II) and satellite project CorAge. Linking in vivo and lab examinations of short-term intraindividual variability with a rich set of medical, cognitive, and psychosocial measures that have been tracked over more than 20 years will allow to intensely address the above study objectives. The suggested research aims to add to the increasing body of evidence on intraindividual variability in old age a differentiated and comprehensive view an both, adaptive flexibility and maladaptive instability in key domains of functioning. Doing so will not only resolve existing inconsistencies in the findings published so far, but promises to provide new insights on resilience and risk for the old and very old individuals’ psycho-social functioning in everyday life.